Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A causally determined agent whose deliberative processes ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Free will is incompatible with causal determinism.

    A causally determined agent whose deliberative processes track and respond to reasons is not relevantly unfree, since the causal chain runs through the self rather than bypassing it.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Freedom requires that actions flow from one's own evaluative commitments, not external coercion or manipulation bypassing deliberation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Causal determination is compatible with freedom if the causal chain includes the agent's reasoning and reflective capacities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.We rightly treat agents differently who act on their reasons versus those who act despite their reasons, suggesting reason-responsiveness matters for freedom.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If the causal chain determining deliberation extends to prior causes beyond the agent's control, the 'self' that deliberates is ultimately unfree.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Reason-tracking processes themselves may be determined by factors the agent cannot control, raising doubts about whether the self is truly originating action.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The distinction between 'running through the self' versus 'bypassing it' may be illusory if the self's contours are themselves causally determined.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Bypassing it(as used in free will philosophy)
    Going around something, skipping over it. In this context, it means an external force controlling your action without involving your own thoughts or reasoning at all.
    Causally determined(in discussions of free will and determinism)
    When something is forced to happen by prior causes—like dominoes falling in a chain where each one had no choice but to fall.
    Deliberative processes(as used in decision-making and agency)
    The thinking and reasoning you do when you're considering different options and deciding what to do.
    Relevantly unfree(as used in debates about free will)
    Not having freedom in a way that actually matters for moral responsibility. The word 'relevantly' means the unfreedom has to be the kind that takes away your moral responsibility for your actions.
    The causal chain runs through the self(as used in compatibilist theories of free will)
    When your own thinking and desires are part of the cause of your actions, rather than something external forcing you to act against your own judgment. It means the cause passes through YOU—your reasoning, your values—not around you.
    Track and respond to reasons(as used in theories of free will)
    When your decisions actually follow from your thinking about good reasons. For example, you choose a healthy snack because you recognize the reason that it's good for you, and that reason actually influences what you pick.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Causal determination is compatible with freedom if the causal chain includes the...Free will is incompatible with causal determinism.Freedom requires that actions flow from one's own evaluative commitments, not ex...If the causal chain determining deliberation extends to prior causes beyond the ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    +3 moreShow less
    Reason-tracking processes themselves may be determined by factors the agent cann...The distinction between 'running through the self' versus 'bypassing it' may be ...We rightly treat agents differently who act on their reasons versus those who ac...