Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A causally determined agent whose deliberative processes track and respond to reasons is not relevantly unfree, since the causal chain runs through the self rather than bypassing it.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If the causal chain determining deliberation extends to prior causes beyond the agent's control, the 'self' that deliberates is ultimately unfree.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Reason-tracking processes themselves may be determined by factors the agent cannot control, raising doubts about whether the self is truly originating action.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The distinction between 'running through the self' versus 'bypassing it' may be illusory if the self's contours are themselves causally determined.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Freedom requires that actions flow from one's own evaluative commitments, not external coercion or manipulation bypassing deliberation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Causal determination is compatible with freedom if the causal chain includes the agent's reasoning and reflective capacities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.We rightly treat agents differently who act on their reasons versus those who act despite their reasons, suggesting reason-responsiveness matters for freedom.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.