Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A claim can be synthetic (significant in Russell's sense)... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Moore's thesis that one ought to do the act which will in fact produce the best consequences could be synthetic but true, even though 'ought to do the best act' and 'will produce the best consequences' are not synonymous claims.

    A claim can be synthetic (significant in Russell's sense) and still be true.

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consequentialism1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Moore's thesis that one ought to do the act which will in fact produce the best ...Non-synonymy of two claims does not entail that either claim is false.

    Similar

    Transcendental claims may be synthetic a priori, placing them between ...82%Analytic claims cannot by themselves establish synthetic conclusions79%Analytic claims are true in virtue of their meaning alone.77%The subsequent claim about synthesis is not presented as self-evident ...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: russell-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    But the fact that these claims are not synonymous does not show that it is false that I ought to do that act which will, in fact, produce the best consequences. The latter claim could be synthetic (or, as Russell would have it, “significant”) but true. Why does Russell think it false? Russell raises the ad hominem objection that Moore’s thesis is flatly inconsistent with the moral conservatism that he goes on to embrace. According to Moore, although “there are cases where [an established moral]

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective