Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The subsequent claim about synthesis is not presented as ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Section §17 of the B-Deduction functions primarily to characterize the concept of an object for use in challenging Humean associationism, not to assert a sufficiency or reciprocity thesis

    The subsequent claim about synthesis is not presented as self-evident but as a conclusion to be confirmed in §§18–20

    Consciousness & MindTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & MindTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Skepticism2 linkedPerception

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consciousness & Mind
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    1 linked

    Related

    If the sufficiency claim and the reciprocity thesis are denied, an alternative a...Kant's characterization of an object in §17 is designed to present his anti-Hume...Section §17 of the B-Deduction functions primarily to characterize the concept o...

    Similar

    Kant's transcendental argument for a priori synthesis is incomplete at...77%Analytic claims cannot by themselves establish synthetic conclusions76%A claim can be synthetic (significant in Russell's sense) and still be...76%Establishing the need for synthesis by means of a priori concepts requ...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: kant-transcendental
    View source passageHide passage
    If the sufficiency claim, and with it the reciprocity thesis, is denied, we need an alternative account of how §17 functions in the overall argument of the B-Deduction. It may be that the role of this section is largely to provide a characterization of an object that has a key role in the ensuing challenge to Humean associationism, and thereby initiates an argument from below. Kant’s proposal is that an object is “that in the concept of which a manifold of a given intuition is united” (B137). Th

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective