Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A criterion that permits reform when expected utility is ... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Moore's principle that individuals should conform to generally useful and generally practiced rules is too conservative and anti-reforming.

    A criterion that permits reform when expected utility is higher is less conservative than one that defers to established practice.

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Virtue Ethics1 linked

    Related

    Expected utility as a criterion allows recommending departures from existing rul...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moore's principle recommends conformity to existing rules on the basis that thos...
    Moore's principle that individuals should conform to generally useful and genera...

    Similar

    The expected utility criterion does not necessarily follow from utilit...79%Criticism directed against expected utility maximization does not nece...75%Moore's principle that individuals should conform to generally useful ...75%Therefore, the expected utility of a decision may differ from the expe...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: russell-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    The criterion of expected utility had another advantage for Russell. It allowed him to recommend a less “conservative and anti-reforming” version of Moore’s principle that “the individual can be confidently recommended … to conform to rules which are generally useful and generally practiced.” Russell was an act-consequentialist rather than a rule-consequentialist. An act is right if the expected consequences of performing it are as good or better than any other. It is not right because it confor

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective