Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A deprivation can only be bad for a subject if that subject exists to be harmed by it (the 'no subject' problem, Epicurus).

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Comparative harm (being worse off than one could have been) doesn't require conscious experience at the moment of deprivation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A person existing later can be harmed by earlier events (e.g., prenatal injury) even if they didn't exist when the harm occurred.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim conflates 'experiencing harm' with 'being harmed'—these may be distinct conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Harm requires a subject with interests or welfare that can be negatively affected by events.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Non-existent entities cannot have experiences, preferences, or a perspective from which to suffer.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Without a subject to register the deprivation, calling it 'bad' lacks a coherent reference point.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.