A doctrine requiring ordinary beings' error as the criterion of conventional truth makes conventional truth subject-relative and therefore unable to support inter-subjective epistemic norms.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Doctrine(refers to the teachings being passed down): A set of beliefs or principles that a philosopher or group teaches and believes to be true.
Epistemic norms(as standards that apply to beliefs): Rules or standards for what makes a belief reasonable or justified—basically, guidelines for how we *should* believe things.
Subject-relative(describing whose perspective determines truth): Something that depends on or varies based on the individual person experiencing or judging it, rather than being the same for everyone.
conventional truth(Jñānagarbha's Mādhyamika epistemology; contrasted with the reality disclosed to concept-free awareness): The framework of causality, arising, perishing, unity, and multiplicity that is indispensable for ordinary experience but does not correspond to ultimate reality

Based on where you are in your exploration