Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A first unmoved mover exists
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
An actually infinite causal series is not demonstrably impossible, as Cantorian set theory shows completed infinities are mathematically coherent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If actual infinities are coherent, the regress of movers need not terminate in a first unmoved mover.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The principle 'no motion without a mover' applies to Aristotelian substances but Newton's first law shows bodies persist in motion without any continuing external cause.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If motion can be intrinsic to a body's inertial state rather than externally imposed, the causal regress of movers never gets started.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
There is no motion without a mover
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The existence of an infinite series in actuality is impossible
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.