Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A full development of desert-based distributive principles requires specification and defense of which activities count as socially productive.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Rawls argues that desert-based claims presuppose a just background structure, making social productivity derivative of institutional design, not prior to it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If the criteria for 'socially productive' are themselves products of institutional choice, desert cannot serve as a pre-institutional basis for distributive principles.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Hayek contends that no central authority possesses the distributed knowledge required to reliably identify which activities produce social value across complex markets.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Desert-based distribution requires precisely the kind of social valuation that dispersed price signals, not philosophical specification, are uniquely equipped to generate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Desert-based distribution depends on identifying which activities are socially productive.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Societies choose raising living standards as the primary value relevant to desert-based distribution.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Not all activities will count as socially productive and hence deserving of remuneration.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.