Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A God of infinite beauty may still exercise eros as a gen... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The kind of love Plato discusses in the Symposium is not found in God

    A God of infinite beauty may still exercise eros as a generative outpouring toward creation, not as desire born of deficiency.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Overflow models of creation (Neoplatonism, medieval theology) distinguish generative giving from acquisitive desire, making both metaphysically coherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Infinite beings can possess motivational states orthogonal to lack: a artist creates from abundance, not deficiency, yet still acts expressively.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Eros as relational openness needn't imply incompleteness; it can denote the dynamic, outward-directed nature of infinite actuality itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Any outpouring 'toward' something suggests directedness absent without prior motivation—which in finite cases traces to desire or need, requiring special pleading for God.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God is truly infinite and self-sufficient, positing generative eros adds unnecessary agency; impersonal emanation avoids this conceptual burden.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The distinction between 'deficiency-based desire' and 'abundant generativity' remains obscure: both describe why an agent acts toward what it lacks or creates.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Against an attribute of God1 linkedAesthetics1 linked

    Related

    Any outpouring 'toward' something suggests directedness absent without prior mot...Eros as relational openness needn't imply incompleteness; it can denote the dyna...If God is truly infinite and self-sufficient, positing generative eros adds unne...Infinite beings can possess motivational states orthogonal to lack: a artist cre...
    +3 moreShow less
    Overflow models of creation (Neoplatonism, medieval theology) distinguish genera...The distinction between 'deficiency-based desire' and 'abundant generativity' re...The kind of love Plato discusses in the Symposium is not found in God

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit