Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Against an attribute of God — Carmelics
    Topics/Philosophy of Religion/Against an attribute of God

    Against an attribute of God

    Arguments challenging a specific attribute of God

    416 ideas in this topic

    153 of 416 ideas have perspectives(37%)

    416 results
    Challenges→Such a punishment is against the mercy of God

    Eternal torture would be more pleasant than ceasing to exist

    40%
    claim
    Challenges→Annihilation is the true Hell

    Annihilation is against the mercy of God

    40%
    claim
    Challenges→Annihilation is the true Hell

    God threatens sensible misery, not annihilation

    40%
    claim

    Omni-theism is very probably false

    ?
    claim
    Challenges→Annihilation is against the mercy of God+2

    Such a punishment is against the mercy of God

    40%
    claim

    A deity that has no interest in the condition or fate of intelligent life would not be worthy of worship.

    70%
    claim

    A necessary and eternal divine mind is not required to ground necessary truths

    ?
    claim

    A philosophy founded on a voluntaristic conception of the deity has no ground of certainty or morality.

    ?
    claim

    Affliction and an omnipotent, wholly benevolent God can coexist.

    70%
    claim

    An omnibenevolent being and an omnipotent being cannot be identical, because their properties conflict.

    ?
    claim

    An omnipotent God is capable of any task, even those yielding contradictions

    70%
    claim
    Challenges→Annihilation is the true Hell

    Annihilationism is against the justice of God

    35%
    claim

    Any degree of existence weaker in intensity than the most complete perfection is not the pure reality of existence.

    70%
    claim

    Appealing to space as a property of God to establish its infinity may be problematic

    ?
    claim

    Appeals to exaggeration and flattery in descriptions of the deity are illegitimate substitutes for argument and reasoning

    ?
    claim

    Attributing world badness directly to God undermines God's goodness

    ?
    claim

    Attributing world badness to uncaused events diminishes God's ruling power

    ?
    claim

    Avicenna's conception of being, used to establish the Necessary Existent, is spurious

    ?
    claim

    Basing moral knowledge on knowledge of God's will is viciously circular

    ?
    claim

    Bosanquet fails to take evil seriously

    ?
    claim

    Cleanthes' concession that happiness must exceed misery is fatal to the religious position

    ?
    claim

    Creation ex nihilo is impossible

    70%
    claim

    Divine providence cannot be the source from which providence derives purely accidentally

    55%
    claim

    Divine providence cannot exercise its relationship with the inferior world as a direct causal relationship

    70%
    claim

    Divinity as a perfect being is entirely beyond having desires and aims.

    70%
    claim

    For all we know, this world may have been created by a limited, inferior, or negligent deity rather than a perfect one

    ?
    claim

    Frankfurt's interpretation requires assuming it is actually true that God is omnipotent in Frankfurt's specified sense.

    ?
    claim

    God can construct a stone such that He cannot lift it, and He can also lift it

    70%
    claim
    Supports→Whatever we clearly and distinctly perceive is true.

    God cannot be a deceiver.

    70%
    claim

    God cannot be a part of some greater composite.

    70%
    claim

    Thinkers in this topic

    Al-Ghazali1Allen Wood1Anselm1Anthony Appiah1
    Augustine
    1
    Avicenna1
    Bhattacharjee1
    Claudia Card1
    F.W.J. Schelling1
    Friedrich Nietzsche1
    Fyodor Dostoyevsky1
    G.W. Leibniz1

    Glossary

    knowledge

    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Deist

    Someone who believes a god or deity created the universe but doesn't believe that god actively interferes with the world or communicates through religion.

    Intelligent life

    Living beings capable of thinking, reasoning, and understanding—like humans, as opposed to plants or simple organisms.

    Intent or intention

    A conscious plan or purpose behind an action; what someone deliberately wanted to happen.

    Worthy of worship

    Deserving enough respect, power, or moral goodness that people should honor and revere it; having qualities that justify religious devotion.

    deity

    A quality that the whole world is in process towards acquiring, not yet achieved and possibly never to be achieved

    Related Topics

    Eternal Conscious Torment453Against an aspect of God242Against a future action of God77Proof of definition segments1659All sources support it595No other argument is better65Annihilation208Against a future action of God12

    Connected Topics

    Topics that share ideas with Against an attribute of God

    Divine Attributes210 sharedNatural Theology62 sharedAnnihilation46 sharedProblem of Evil39 sharedAgainst an aspect of God13 sharedMoral Responsibility8 sharedTruth & Knowledge5 sharedFree Will & Foreknowledge5 shared

    Help Build This Topic

    263 propositions still need supporting arguments.