Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A maxim cannot count as self-evident unless it is evident... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Self-evident axioms (such as the Kantian maxim) cannot serve as the basis for ethical judgments.

    A maxim cannot count as self-evident unless it is evident to every qualified judge.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moral Responsibility
    1 linked

    Related

    No material moral precept has obtained the universal consent of moralists.Self-evident axioms (such as the Kantian maxim) cannot serve as the basis for et...The Kantian maxim is purely formal and lacks material content.

    Similar

    A self-evident proposition is one whose truth is justified by a clear ...82%Under standard self-evidence (SE), a self-evident proposition is evide...82%A self-evident proposition is one whose truth does not derive from any...81%Self-evident propositions are not incapable of proof; their being self...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: russell-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    “Ethical Axioms” (1894) was the last piece that Russell wrote for Sidgwick’s course on ethics (RoE: 53–56/Papers 1: 226–228). Russell takes it as a datum that “we do make moral judgments” and that “we regard these, like judgments as to what is, as liable to truth and falsehood”. We are “precluded from skepticism” (presumably the view that moral judgments are all false) “by the mere fact we will and act”. (This is not a very convincing argument since I can desire something—and hence act—without t

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective