Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Self-evident axioms (such as the Kantian maxim) cannot se... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Self-evident axioms (such as the Kantian maxim) cannot serve as the basis for ethical judgments.

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The Kantian maxim is purely formal and lacks material content.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.No material moral precept has obtained the universal consent of moralists.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A maxim cannot count as self-evident unless it is evident to every qualified judge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    2 topics

    Skepticism2 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    A maxim cannot count as self-evident unless it is evident to every qualified jud...No material moral precept has obtained the universal consent of moralists.The Kantian maxim is purely formal and lacks material content.

    Similar

    A maxim cannot count as self-evident unless it is evident to every qua...80%Some basis must be found for ethical judgments.78%Ross's considered view does not hold that self-evident moral propositi...78%Clifford's Rule — believe only those propositions that enjoy adequate ...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: russell-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    “Ethical Axioms” (1894) was the last piece that Russell wrote for Sidgwick’s course on ethics (RoE: 53–56/Papers 1: 226–228). Russell takes it as a datum that “we do make moral judgments” and that “we regard these, like judgments as to what is, as liable to truth and falsehood”. We are “precluded from skepticism” (presumably the view that moral judgments are all false) “by the mere fact we will and act”. (This is not a very convincing argument since I can desire something—and hence act—without t
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit