Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A phenomenal difference can be epistemically unusable if ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Participants' failure to report the gorilla may be due to the phenomenal difference being epistemically unusable rather than absent.

    A phenomenal difference can be epistemically unusable if it is immediately forgotten.

    Consciousness & MindSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismConsciousness & Mind

    Related

    A phenomenal difference can be epistemically unusable if it is too unstructured ...Participants' failure to report the gorilla may be due to the phenomenal differe...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A phenomenal difference can be epistemically unusable if it is too uns...90%If phenomenal differences were independent of conceptual thought and u...76%Participants' failure to report the gorilla may be due to the phenomen...75%If phenomenal properties do not metaphysically supervene on physical p...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: attention
    View source passageHide passage
    No single one of these experiments can establish the claim that attention is always necessary for consciousness. That claim is a universally quantified one, and is not entailed by any one of its instances. Nor is it clear that what we see in these experiments really are instances in which unattended objects drop out of consciousness altogether. The participants’ ignorance of the gorilla’s appearance, for example, is compatible with it being the case that the presence of the gorilla does make a p

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective