Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A phenomenal zombie and a conscious being share identical causal powers by definition, yet Chalmers argues they instantiate distinct psychological states.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Zombies are conceivable but not metaphysically possible given our physics; conceivability alone doesn't establish distinct psychological states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If zombies truly share all causal powers, they must process information identically—making consciousness epiphenomenal or not a genuine psychological state.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Defining zombies by causal identity while claiming psychological difference conflates consciousness with subjective appearance rather than properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Causal powers exhaust what functional/behavioral theories can capture, yet consciousness involves intrinsic phenomenal properties beyond function.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The zombie intuition shows conceivability of identical causes with different conscious states, suggesting consciousness is metaphysically distinct.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If psychological states were solely constituted by causal powers, consciousness couldn't vary while causation remains constant—but it can.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.