Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A play of the TWO PLAYER SAT verification game mirrors th... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→TWO PLAYER SAT is PSPACE-complete

    A play of the TWO PLAYER SAT verification game mirrors the interpretation of existential and universal quantifiers in QBF formulas

    Modality & PossibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Any QBF formula with n initial quantifiers can be efficiently converted to an eq...TQBF is PSPACE-completeTWO PLAYER SAT is PSPACE-completeφ ∈ TWO PLAYER SAT if and only if φ ∈ TQBF

    Similar

    In SQML, evaluating an existentially quantified formula at any possibl...78%It is contrary to expectation that longer verification games are no ha...78%Winning strategies for n-round verification games are captured by TWO ...77%Believing PH = PSPACE leads to the counterintuitive conclusion that n-...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    [26] A complexity class which is likely to be properly contained in \(\textbf{EXP}\) but which still contains many apparently infeasible problems which arise in computational practice is \(\textbf{PSPACE}\). e. a statement of the form \(Q_1 x_i \ldots Q_n x_n\psi\) where \(Q_i = \exists\) or \(\forall\) and \(\psi\) is a formula of propositional logic containing the propositional variables \(x_1,\ldots,x_n\) which are treated as bound by these quantifiers. g. \(\forall x_1 \exists x_2 (x_1 \vee

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective