Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    φ ∈ TWO PLAYER SAT if and only if φ ∈ TQBF — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→TWO PLAYER SAT is PSPACE-complete

    φ ∈ TWO PLAYER SAT if and only if φ ∈ TQBF

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A play of the TWO PLAYER SAT verification game mirrors the interpretation of exi...Any QBF formula with n initial quantifiers can be efficiently converted to an eq...TQBF is PSPACE-completeTWO PLAYER SAT is PSPACE-complete

    Similar

    The Main Theorem establishes that Γ ⊨_MSL φ if and only if Trans(Γ)∪Π ...89%The Main Theorem establishes that Γ ⊨_MSL φ if and only if Trans(Γ) ∪ ...85%F = G if and only if for all x, Fx if and only if Gx.85%φ ∈ complement-of-SAT if and only if ¬φ ∈ VALID82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    [26] A complexity class which is likely to be properly contained in \(\textbf{EXP}\) but which still contains many apparently infeasible problems which arise in computational practice is \(\textbf{PSPACE}\). e. a statement of the form \(Q_1 x_i \ldots Q_n x_n\psi\) where \(Q_i = \exists\) or \(\forall\) and \(\psi\) is a formula of propositional logic containing the propositional variables \(x_1,\ldots,x_n\) which are treated as bound by these quantifiers. g. \(\forall x_1 \exists x_2 (x_1 \vee

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective