Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A pragmatic argument cannot deliver an all-purpose, gener... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    A pragmatic argument cannot deliver an all-purpose, general justification for following the inductive rule

    Skepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.A pragmatic solution should be sensitive to differences in pay-offs
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Pay-offs depend on the circumstances
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.An all-purpose justification would not be sensitive to circumstantial differences in pay-offs
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A pragmatic solution should be sensitive to differences in pay-offs

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    An all-purpose justification would not be sensitive to circumstantial difference...
    Pay-offs depend on the circumstances

    Similar

    Any justification for inductive reasoning must appeal to either an ind...82%Supplying a sufficient reason for action is enough to justify followin...81%Circular arguments can provide an acceptable justification for inducti...79%An inductive argument from intuitions about particular cases of justif...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: induction-problem
    View source passageHide passage
    Reichenbach’s justification is generally taken to be a pragmatic one, since though it does not supply knowledge of a future event, it supplies a sufficient reason for action (Reichenbach 1949: 481). One might question whether a pragmatic argument can really deliver an all-purpose, general justification for following the inductive rule. Surely a pragmatic solution should be sensitive to differences in pay-offs that depend on the circumstances. For example, Reichenbach offers the following analogu
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit