Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    A separation between P and NP would therefore manifest as... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→P ≠ NP if and only if there exists a class of ordered structures definable in existential second-order logic which is not definable by a formula of FO(LFP)

    A separation between P and NP would therefore manifest as a class of structures expressible in SO∃ but not in FO(LFP)

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    NP is captured by existential second-order logic (SO∃) over ordered structuresP is captured by FO(LFP) over ordered structuresP ≠ NP if and only if there exists a class of ordered structures definable in ex...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Real distinction, according to Scotus, requires separability78%For any sentence φ that characterizes a structure M up to isomorphism,...76%It is widely believed that NP and coNP are distinct classes.76%If we in M suspect that Martians in M' can distinguish a from b, then ...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    The logic \(\textsf{SO}(\texttt{LFP})\) and \(\textsf{SO}(\texttt{TC})\) are defined analogously by adding these operators to \(\textsf{SO}\) and allowing them to apply to formulas containing second-order variables. e. models \(\mathcal{A}\) for structures interpreting \(\leq\) as a linear order on \(A\)). Immerman (1999, p. 3 as “increas[ing] our intuition that polynomial time is a class whose fundamental nature goes beyond the machine models with which it is usually defined”. e. \(\textbf{P} \

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective