Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A set cannot exist without its members existing. — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A theory containing '∃x x = {a, b}' is ontologically committed to the existence of a, even though a need not be assigned as a value to the variable 'x' for the theory to be true.

    A set cannot exist without its members existing.

    Modality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & Possibility

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge3 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    A theory containing '∃x x = {a, b}' is ontologically committed to the existence ...If entity X cannot exist without entity Y existing, then a theory asserting X's ...The theory contains '∃x x = {a, b}', asserting the existence of the set {a, b}.

    Similar

    The existence of a set necessitates the existence of any of its member...88%A set cannot both be and not be a member of itself simultaneously83%If Basic Law V holds, there must exist a set R of all sets that are no...83%Sets are generally understood as having their members essentially (i.e...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ontological-commitment
    View source passageHide passage
    The problem of extrinsic properties arises because there are analytic connections between one predicate holding of a thing and another predicate holding of some other thing. Similar problems arise for quantifier criteria if there are metaphysically necessary connections between non-identical things. Thus, if a set cannot exist without its members existing, then it appears that a theory that contains ‘∃x x = {a, b}’ is ontologically committed to the existence of a. But a need not be assigned as

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective