Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If entity X cannot exist without entity Y existing, then ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Connected to 2 discussions

    Supports→A theory containing '∃x x = Obama' is ontologically committed to the existence of Obama's head, even though Obama's head need not be assigned as a value to the variable 'x' for the theory to be true.
    Supports→A theory containing '∃x x = {a, b}' is ontologically committed to the existence of a, even though a need not be assigned as a value to the variable 'x' for the theory to be true.

    If entity X cannot exist without entity Y existing, then a theory asserting X's existence is ontologically committed to Y's existence.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A human cannot exist without his head.A set cannot exist without its members existing.A theory containing '∃x x = Obama' is ontologically committed to the existence o...A theory containing '∃x x = {a, b}' is ontologically committed to the existence ...
    +3 moreShow less
    A whole cannot exist without each of its parts existing.The theory contains '∃x x = Obama', asserting Obama's existence.The theory contains '∃x x = {a, b}', asserting the existence of the set {a, b}.

    Similar

    A theory that entails that Ks exist does not thereby incur ontological...89%The ontological commitments of a theory are not necessarily entities w...86%Any reading that requires the existence of an entity in a real domain ...83%The ontological argument claims that because the idea of God includes ...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ontological-commitment
    View source passageHide passage
    The problem of extrinsic properties arises because there are analytic connections between one predicate holding of a thing and another predicate holding of some other thing. Similar problems arise for quantifier criteria if there are metaphysically necessary connections between non-identical things. Thus, if a set cannot exist without its members existing, then it appears that a theory that contains ‘∃x x = {a, b}’ is ontologically committed to the existence of a. But a need not be assigned as

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective