Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A theory of well-being must explain what unifies its diff... — Carmelics
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Scanlon's view of well-being does not constitute a theory of well-being

    A theory of well-being must explain what unifies its different elements and how those elements are to be compared

    Truth & KnowledgeVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue EthicsTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Scanlon's view does not explain what unifies its elements (success in rational a...Scanlon's view of well-being does not constitute a theory of well-being

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A theory of well-being would need to explain what unifies its elements...98%How elements of well-being are unified and compared depends heavily on...86%No theory of well-being is likely to be available81%Scanlon's view of well-being does not constitute a theory of well-bein...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: well-being
    View source passageHide passage
    One immediately odd aspect of Scanlon’s position that ‘well-being’ is an otiose notion in ethics is that he himself seems to have a view on what well-being is. It involves, he believes, among other things, success in one’s rational aims, and personal relations. But Scanlon claims that his view is not a ‘theory of well-being’, since a theory must explain what unifies these different elements, and how they are to be compared. And, he adds, no such theory is ever likely to be available, since such

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective