Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A theory that demotes non-representational agency to a 'm... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The standard theory of agency is not too demanding, even if some non-human beings capable of agency lack representational mental states

    A theory that demotes non-representational agency to a 'more basic kind' systematically excludes it from the morally and practically significant domain the standard theory was designed to explain.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Demotes(as used in this argument about how theories treat different kinds of action)
    Reduces in rank or importance; treats something as less significant or valuable than it actually is.
    Morally and practically significant(as used in ethics and philosophy of action)
    Important enough to matter for real-world decisions and questions about what is right or wrong—things that actually affect how we should live.
    Standard theory(philosophy of mind)
    The widely accepted or mainstream explanation of a topic in philosophy—in this case, likely referring to a common theory about how minds work.
    Systematically excludes(as used in critiques of philosophical theories)
    Deliberately or as a built-in consequence of the theory's structure, leaves something out or prevents it from being considered.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    agency(Used to assess whether switching the trolley is deontologically prohibited.)
    A morally relevant sense in which an agent is the direct cause of harm, invoked in deontological constraints; its absence removes a deontological bar to acting.
    non-representational agency(as an alternative form of agency being contrasted)
    The ability to act and make choices without needing thoughts or mental representations—more like how animals might act on pure instinct.
    representational(used to discuss whether experiences can be captured in some form that others can understand)
    Something that stands for or describes something else—like how words represent ideas, or how a painting represents a scene.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    The standard theory of agency is not too demanding, even if some non-human being...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective