Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A theory that leaves resemblance respects unspecified can... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Abell's resemblance theory of depiction is consistent with the diversity constraint

    A theory that leaves resemblance respects unspecified cannot distinguish depiction from non-depictive symbol systems that also bear some resemblance to their objects.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Maps and diagrams resemble their targets but function non-depictively; vagueness about resemblance cannot distinguish them from pictures.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Without specifying which resemblances matter, a theory conflates iconic signs (share properties with objects) with depictive representation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Depiction requires explaining why some resemblances are representationally relevant while others are not—unspecified resemblance cannot do this.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Maps and diagrams ARE depictive systems; the claim falsely assumes a sharp boundary between depiction and non-depictive symbols.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A theory can respect resemblance while distinguishing depiction through other criteria: conventional use, intentional design, or perceptual access.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The challenge assumes resemblance is the only explanatory resource available, ignoring pragmatic and contextual factors that differentiate representations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Aesthetics1 linked

    Related

    A theory can respect resemblance while distinguishing depiction through other cr...Abell's resemblance theory of depiction is consistent with the diversity constra...Depiction requires explaining why some resemblances are representationally relev...Maps and diagrams ARE depictive systems; the claim falsely assumes a sharp bound...
    +3 moreShow less
    Maps and diagrams resemble their targets but function non-depictively; vagueness...The challenge assumes resemblance is the only explanatory resource available, ig...Without specifying which resemblances matter, a theory conflates iconic signs (s...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit