Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that A theory that leaves resemblance respects unspecified cannot distinguish depiction from non-depictive symbol systems that also bear some resemblance to their objects.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Maps and diagrams ARE depictive systems; the claim falsely assumes a sharp boundary between depiction and non-depictive symbols.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A theory can respect resemblance while distinguishing depiction through other criteria: conventional use, intentional design, or perceptual access.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The challenge assumes resemblance is the only explanatory resource available, ignoring pragmatic and contextual factors that differentiate representations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Maps and diagrams resemble their targets but function non-depictively; vagueness about resemblance cannot distinguish them from pictures.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Without specifying which resemblances matter, a theory conflates iconic signs (share properties with objects) with depictive representation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Depiction requires explaining why some resemblances are representationally relevant while others are not—unspecified resemblance cannot do this.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.