Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A violation of Outcome Independence (OI) implies spatiotemporal non-separability
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Spatiotemporal separability admits multiple precise formulations (Earman, Howard) that are not all logically equivalent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The entailment from separability to OI holds only under Howard's strong holism-denying formulation, not under weaker variants.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A violation of OI therefore implies only that Howard's specific strong separability fails, not spatiotemporal non-separability per se.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Bohmian mechanics violates OI through the quantum potential yet remains committed to particles with definite spatiotemporal trajectories.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If a theory can violate OI while preserving well-defined spatiotemporal particle locations, spatiotemporal non-separability is not a necessary consequence of OI-violation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Spatiotemporal separability implies Outcome Independence (OI)
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If a condition implies OI, then a violation of OI implies a violation of that condition
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42