Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that A virtue ethical theory can be both extensionally and explanatorily adequate
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Virtue ethics derives action-guidance from character traits, but character traits are situationally variable, as Harman and Doris demonstrate empirically.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A theory whose central explanatory concept lacks cross-situational stability cannot generate reliable extensional verdicts about what agents ought to do.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Expanding virtue ethics by importing normative concepts like rights or consequences creates theoretical pluralism, not a unified virtue-ethical framework.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A theory that borrows extensional adequacy from rival frameworks explains right action through those frameworks, not through virtue, undermining its explanatory autonomy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Making room for normative concepts not reducible to virtue and vice increases the theory's coverage
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Virtue ethicists have multiple resources available to address the adequacy objection
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.