Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    A virtuous agent will not want to cause suffering even if... — Carmelics
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Lewis's modal realism does not lead to the elimination of moral requirements.

    A virtuous agent will not want to cause suffering even if their actions make no difference to the nature of the pluriverse.

    ConsequentialismVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue EthicsConsequentialism

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moral Responsibility
    2 linked

    Related

    By rejecting equal concern for all possible individuals, Lewis avoids the infere...Lewis rejects the premise that in moral deliberations we should care about all p...Lewis's modal realism does not lead to the elimination of moral requirements.What is crucial about morality is that agents refrain from doing evil, not that ...

    Similar

    What is crucial about morality is that agents refrain from doing evil,...81%A truly virtuous agent must necessarily have a supreme love to God, bo...77%An agent whose action is never the one most supported by reasons does ...77%The virtuous agent is not created by the political structure the agent...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: david-lewis
    View source passageHide passage
    Robert Adams (1974) argues that modal realism leads to surprising results in moral philosophy. The modal realist says that the way things are, in the broadest possible sense, is not a contingent matter, since we can’t change the nature of the pluriverse. Hence we cannot do anything about it. So if moral requirements flow from a requirement to improve the way things are, in this broadest possible sense, then there are no moral requirements. Lewis rejects the antecedent of this conditional as some

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective