Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Abraham's obligation to sacrifice Isaac is a genuine duty. — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→There exist genuine duties that cannot be justified in terms of social norms.

    Abraham's obligation to sacrifice Isaac is a genuine duty.

    Insubordination to GodMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityInsubordination to God

    Connections

    1 topic

    Social Contract3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Abraham's obligation to sacrifice Isaac is unintelligible and unjustifiable with...There exist genuine duties that cannot be justified in terms of social norms.Therefore, at least one genuine duty falls outside the scope of social-norm just...

    Similar

    Abraham's obligation to sacrifice Isaac is unintelligible and unjustif...83%Abraham recognizes a duty to obey God's commands.80%Being compelled to sacrifice one basic duty or need in order to fulfil...79%Abraham's duty to obey God's command supersedes both social duty and p...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: kierkegaard
    View source passageHide passage
    Kierkegaard, however, recognizes duties that cannot be justified in terms of social norms. Much of Fear and Trembling turns on the notion that Abraham’s would-be sacrifice of his son Isaac is ineffable in terms of social norms, and requires a “teleological suspension of the ethical”. That is, Abraham recognizes a duty to something higher than both his social duty not to kill an innocent person and his personal commitment to his beloved son, viz. his duty to obey God’s commands. However, he canno

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective