Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Accepting or rejecting a hypothesis requires judging whic... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Ethical judgments and contextual values necessarily enter the scientist's core activity of accepting and rejecting hypotheses, refuting the Value-Neutrality Thesis (VNT).

    Accepting or rejecting a hypothesis requires judging which consequences of error are more palatable.

    ConsequentialismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    ConsequentialismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Bioethics4 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Justice & Punishment
    1 linked

    Related

    Another possible error is that individuals die from a condition because they lac...Choosing between these error types is a value judgment.Ethical judgments and contextual values necessarily enter the scientist's core a...One possible error is that some individuals die from side effects of a drug erro...

    Similar

    Mill rejects the method of hypothesis as an autonomous and valid form ...81%Whether evidence is sufficiently strong depends on the importance of m...79%Paraconsistentists may reject the inference from □¬p to ¬◇p78%It is sometimes rational to suspend judgment and refuse to rank altern...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: scientific-objectivity
    View source passageHide passage
    The decision to accept or reject a hypothesis involves a value judgment (at least implicitly) because scientists have to judge which of the consequences of an erroneous decision they deem more palatable: (1) some individuals die of the side effects of a drug erroneously judged to be safe; or (2) other individuals die of a condition because they did not have access to a treatment that was erroneously judged to be unsafe. Hence, ethical judgments and contextual values necessarily enter the scienti

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective