Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Actual humans have desires, emotions, and irrational proc... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Even if an ideal moral code for perfectly moral humans could be conceptualized, it would be normatively inadequate

    Actual humans have desires, emotions, and irrational proclivities

    Virtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue Ethics

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consequentialism2 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    A moral code designed for hypothetically perfectly moral beings does not address...A moral code that does not address the actual conditions of real humans provides...Even if an ideal moral code for perfectly moral humans could be conceptualized, ...

    Similar

    Normal human beings naturally desire for others what they desire for t...81%The human soul has both rational and non-rational aspects that fight f...80%Agents can be irrational or vicious precisely because they lack certai...79%For Kant, practical irrationality, both moral and prudential, focuses ...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: spencer
    View source passageHide passage
    For Sidgwick, Spencer’s utilitarianism was merely seemingly deductive even though it purported to be more scientific and rigorously rational than “empirical” utilitarianism. However, deductive hedonism fails because, contrary to what deductive hedonists like Spencer think, no general science of the causes of pleasure and pain exists, insuring that we will never succeed in formulating universal, indefeasible moral rules for promoting happiness. Moreover, Spencer only makes matters worse for himse

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective