Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Aesthetic experience cannot support morality through feel... — Carmelics
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Aesthetic experience cannot support morality through feelings of sociability alone

    Aesthetics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Morality requires an a priori principle, not mere feelings of sociability
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.An 'empirical interest in the beautiful' produces only feelings of sociability
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Only an 'intellectual interest in the beautiful' is compatible with morality's a priori foundation
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    AestheticsVirtue Ethics

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    An 'empirical interest in the beautiful' produces only feelings of sociabilityMorality requires an a priori principle, not mere feelings of sociabilityOnly an 'intellectual interest in the beautiful' is compatible with morality's a...

    Similar

    Aesthetic experience is of direct moral value.81%Feelings of sociability support attempts to be moral80%Aesthetic experience is of indirect moral value.80%Aesthetic and teleological experience provide sensuous confirmation of...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: aesthetics-18th-german
    View source passageHide passage
    Some of Herz’s most interesting points and his greatest differences with Kant’s theory of taste emerge in the discussion of the influence of morality on taste. Herz argues that the enjoyment of beauty contributes to morality in two ways, directly and indirectly. The enjoyment of beauty contributes to morality directly because as a source of mental activity it is a source of happiness, and happiness is nothing less than the aim of morality. Here again Herz adopts the same positions as Sulzer. Her
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit