Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    After reviewing modal, counterfactual, metaphysical, and ... — Carmelics
    Home/Free Will & Foreknowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Causal dependence is the best model for understanding how God can foreknow what you will do because you will do it.

    After reviewing modal, counterfactual, metaphysical, and logical analyses of explanatory dependence, and taking in lessons from time travel cases, causal dependence emerges as the best model.

    Free Will & Foreknowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    Key Terms

    Explanatory dependence(as the central concept the statement is analyzing)
    The idea that one thing depends on another because the second thing explains why the first thing exists or is the way it is.
    Logical analysis(what grammatical structure can mislead about)
    The process of breaking down statements into their core meaning and truth-value to see what they're really claiming, separate from how they're written.
    Time travel cases(as examples philosophers use to test theories about how things cause other things)
    Hypothetical scenarios used in philosophy where someone travels backward or forward in time, used to test whether our ideas about cause and effect still make sense.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Free Will & Foreknowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    causal dependence(Lewis's counterfactual theory of causation)
    A counterfactual relation in which an effect depends on a cause such that, had the cause not occurred, the effect would not have occurred.
    counterfactual(Modal logic and epistemology)
    A conditional statement concerning what would be the case if some antecedent condition were true, evaluated across possible worlds; contraposition does not hold in general for counterfactuals.
    metaphysical analysis(contrasted with conceptual analysis)
    An explanatory account of a normative property that gives the property's essential nature; arguably not a priori, necessarily true if true at all, and underwrites identity claims
    modal analysis(Philosophy of ability and linguistic semantics)
    The semantic view that ability ascriptions of the form 'S is able to A' are analyzed as possibility claims quantifying over possible worlds

    Related

    Causal dependence is the best model for understanding how God can foreknow what ...

    Similar

    Causal dependence is the best model for understanding how God can fore...78%Hole freeness precludes an important mode of failure of causal determi...73%Every event in the phenomenal realm is fully determined by chains of c...71%The dependence point alone does not show that the hard past isn't fixe...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: free-will-foreknowledge
    View source passageHide passage
    Swenson (2016) argues that what’s fixed isn’t the past in toto, but so much of the past as isn’t dependent on the future. Rather than modifying the principle of the fixity of the past, Law (2020) advocates junking it altogether and replacing it with the principle of the fixity of the independent. Law (2021) continues the case for replacing the fixity of the past with the fixity of the independent by arguing that the former, insofar as the past is fixed, is derivative from the latter. In two recent papers, Ryan Wasserman stakes out positions that differ from most other defenders of the dependen...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective