Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    AGM belief revision cannot clearly express iterated belie... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Epistemic logic can express principles that AGM belief revision and non-monotonic logic cannot straightforwardly express

    AGM belief revision cannot clearly express iterated belief (BBp) because membership in a belief set does not straightforwardly encode higher-order belief

    Consciousness & MindTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & MindTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Epistemic logic can express principles that AGM belief revision and non-monotoni...Epistemic logic can express the principle that if an agent believes p, then the ...Non-monotonic logic cannot straightforwardly express the principle Bp → BBp eith...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consciousness & Mind
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Stabilization of beliefs cannot be taken for granted under iterated up...77%AGM belief revision and non-monotonic logic do not have separate opera...77%The revised belief state is obtained by incorporating the antecedent p...77%Logical approaches to update require the notion of conditional belief.75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: formal-belief
    View source passageHide passage
    Epistemic logic, which in its modern formulation is typically traced to von Wright (1951) and Hintikka (1962), is a formal framework designed to foreground these matters. For an influential introductory text, see Fagin et al. (1995). The formal language of epistemic logic extends that of propositional logic with epistemic operators \({\bf B}_a \phi\) and \({\bf K}_a \phi\), pronounced respectively as ‘agent \(a\) believes that \(\phi\),’ and ‘agent \(a\) knows that \(\phi.\)’ When only one agent

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective