Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that All of Adam@'s properties are essential to him (superessentialism).

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.When we speak of an Adam who sinned and an Adam who did not, we cannot be referring to the same individual.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Failure of identical reference across possible worlds entails that every property distinguishing an individual is essential to that individual.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Leibniz's Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles implies that any difference in properties yields a numerically distinct substance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.