Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Alvin Plantinga and other Reformed epistemologists argue ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Adherents of non-Christian religions can enter God's presence even without awareness of Jesus's redemptive acts.

    Alvin Plantinga and other Reformed epistemologists argue that salvific knowledge requires properly functioning cognitive faculties oriented toward specifically Christian revelation.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Humans have cognitive faculties (sensus divinitatis) naturally oriented toward detecting divine reality, analogous to perceptual faculties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Sin damages these faculties, requiring restoration through Christian revelation to reliably access salvific knowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Properly functioning faculties in their designed context form a justified basis for belief, without requiring independent philosophical argument.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The claim privileges Christian revelation without explaining why Muslim, Hindu, or Buddhist practitioners report equally vivid experiences of the divine.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Defining 'proper function' theologically rather than empirically makes the view circular—it assumes Christian truth to justify Christian knowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Many epistemically virtuous non-Christians with well-functioning rational faculties reject Christian revelation, suggesting orientation toward it isn't necessary for knowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Alvin Plantinga(as the originator of the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism)
    A contemporary American philosopher known for arguing that belief in God is rational without needing scientific proof, and for challenging the idea that evolution supports atheism.
    Christian revelation(as the overall conclusion being evaluated)
    The religious teachings and truths that Christians believe God has made known to humanity, especially through Jesus and the Bible.
    Properly functioning(describing the condition of cognitive faculties)
    Working the way it's supposed to work, without defects or damage; in this context, it means your thinking abilities are operating as they were designed to.
    Reformed epistemologists(as the philosophical school Plantinga belongs to)
    A group of philosophers who argue that knowledge doesn't require the kind of scientific proof or logical demonstration that many people think it does; they often defend religious belief as a valid form of knowledge.
    Salvific knowledge(as the type of knowledge being discussed)
    Knowledge that is necessary for salvation in Christian theology; roughly, the kind of understanding about God and faith that Christians believe saves a person's soul.
    cognitive faculties(referring to our ability to understand religious claims)
    Our mental abilities to think, reason, perceive, and understand—basically, the mental tools our brains use to figure out what's true.
    epistemology(Contrasted with purely descriptive scientific inquiry)
    A normative enterprise that tells us how we ought to reason from evidence and how we ought to justify our beliefs, as distinct from merely describing how we do reason or justify beliefs
    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Religious Experience1 linked

    Related

    Adherents of non-Christian religions can enter God's presence even without aware...Defining 'proper function' theologically rather than empirically makes the view ...Humans have cognitive faculties (sensus divinitatis) naturally oriented toward d...Many epistemically virtuous non-Christians with well-functioning rational facult...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    +3 moreShow less
    Properly functioning faculties in their designed context form a justified basis ...Sin damages these faculties, requiring restoration through Christian revelation ...The claim privileges Christian revelation without explaining why Muslim, Hindu, ...