Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Alvin Plantinga's reformed epistemology grounds warrant i... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→God can apply the results of Jesus's atoning death and resurrection to people who have never heard of Jesus or acknowledged his lordship.

    Alvin Plantinga's reformed epistemology grounds warrant in proper function, suggesting salvific belief formed without Christological content lacks the cognitive structure required for saving faith.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Proper function requires cognitive faculties operating as designed; Christian salvation requires specific content about Christ's redemptive work.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Generic theistic belief lacks the soteriological specificity required for saving faith as attested in Christian Scripture and tradition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Warrant demands reliable truth-tracking; Christological content provides necessary cognitive structure distinguishing saving from non-saving belief.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Plantinga himself grants warrant can attach to beliefs formed properly but with false content; Christological specificity may not be functionally necessary.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Many theologians argue salvific faith fundamentally involves trust/reliance rather than propositional content; proper function could ground trust alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Defining 'proper function' requires antecedent theological commitments; the claim circularity smuggles in conclusions rather than deriving them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Alvin Plantinga(as the originator of the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism)
    A contemporary American philosopher known for arguing that belief in God is rational without needing scientific proof, and for challenging the idea that evolution supports atheism.
    Christological content(the element the statement says is missing from the salvific belief being criticized)
    Anything related to Jesus Christ and Christian teachings about who he is and what he did; content involving Christ.
    Cognitive structure(what is being incorrectly projected onto reality)
    The way your brain organizes and processes information—the mental patterns and frameworks you use to think.
    Reformed epistemology
    An epistemological position holding that belief in God can be rational without being based on arguments or evidence, because such belief may be properly basic.
    Salvific belief(the type of belief being analyzed)
    A religious belief that is thought to bring salvation (spiritual redemption or eternal life); basically, a belief that saves your soul.
    Saving faith(what the statement concludes requires proper cognitive structure)
    Religious faith or belief that is powerful and structured enough to actually bring salvation; faith that truly saves rather than merely being a casual belief.
    epistemology(Contrasted with purely descriptive scientific inquiry)
    A normative enterprise that tells us how we ought to reason from evidence and how we ought to justify our beliefs, as distinct from merely describing how we do reason or justify beliefs
    proper function(Millikan's term; contrasted with causal-role-based functionalist accounts)
    The function of a mental state as determined by its evolutionary or learning history, which can differ between states that share identical causal roles.
    warrant(Toulmin's model of argumentation)
    An implicit premise that an argument depends on, which licenses the move from evidence to conclusion; in this context, the unstated assumption that normal misdemeanor penalties are insufficient as a deterrent.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Religious Experience1 linked

    Related

    Defining 'proper function' requires antecedent theological commitments; the clai...Generic theistic belief lacks the soteriological specificity required for saving...God can apply the results of Jesus's atoning death and resurrection to people wh...Many theologians argue salvific faith fundamentally involves trust/reliance rath...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    +3 moreShow less
    Plantinga himself grants warrant can attach to beliefs formed properly but with ...Proper function requires cognitive faculties operating as designed; Christian sa...Warrant demands reliable truth-tracking; Christological content provides necessa...