Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Amusement at a funny joke may be fitting even if expressi... — Carmelics
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Fittingness is distinct from moral or strategic appropriateness

    Amusement at a funny joke may be fitting even if expressing amusement is costly to self-interest because observers may form a negative opinion of the amused agent

    AestheticsMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    AestheticsMoral Responsibility

    Related

    Amusement at a funny joke may be fitting even if the joke has sexist content tha...Fittingness is distinct from moral or strategic appropriateness

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Amusement at a funny joke may be fitting even if the joke has sexist c...74%Laughing at cruel jokes at a friend's expense reveals attitudes incons...71%Instead, Hobbes publicly advanced the unpopular and personally dangero...69%An agent's assessment of the relative costs of erroneously believing p...69%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: emotion
    View source passageHide passage
    Our first distinctions pertain to three varieties of cognitive rationality for emotions: rationality as fittingness, rationality as warrant and rationality as coherence. The dominant view on emotions is that they are representations of core relational themes or formal objects. Therefore, a first dimension of assessment for rationality concerns whether or not such core relational themes/formal objects are instantiated. We may for instance say that fear is rational in terms of fittingness just in

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective