Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    An account that blocks transitivity better fits the epist... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The Naiyāyika third clause blocks causal transitivity, suggesting the Naiyāyikas are defining causal salience rather than causality per se.

    An account that blocks transitivity better fits the epistemic notion of 'causal explanation' or 'causal salience'.

    CausationTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    CausationTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Blocking transitivity departs from standard definitions of causality.Most accounts treat causality as a transitive relation: if A causes B and B caus...The Naiyāyika third clause blocks causal transitivity, suggesting the Naiyāyikas...The Naiyāyika third clause is used to prevent the cause of a cause (e.g., the po...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Most accounts treat causality as a transitive relation: if A causes B ...84%The Naiyāyika third clause blocks causal transitivity, suggesting the ...83%Blocking transitivity departs from standard definitions of causality.82%Agent-causal accounts do not provide such an explanation.82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: early-modern-india
    View source passageHide passage
    The first clause is to prevent self-causation. The import of the second condition is that entities similar to c must always exist with entities similar to e. There must be an invariable or constant conjunction between c-type entities and e-type entities. This rules out objects which just happen to be there, such as, to give the Naiyāyikas’ example, a donkey happening to wander past the pottery just as the potter goes to work. This feature of the account, the insistence that a causal relation ins

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective