Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    An argument whose key premise merely restates the conclus... — Carmelics
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The branching roads metaphor fails as an argument for incompatibilism.

    An argument whose key premise merely restates the conclusion it is meant to support begs the question.

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Free Will & Foreknowledge3 linkedModality & Possibility

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    1 linked

    Related

    The branching roads metaphor fails as an argument for incompatibilism.This claim is simply a restatement of the incompatibilist position rather than a...When the branching roads metaphor is stripped of figurative language, its main p...

    Similar

    If a supporting premise is sufficient on its own to establish the conc...84%An argument whose premises presuppose its conclusion cannot rationally...83%When an argument rests on a mistaken premise, the correct response is ...82%The argument reasons to a conclusion that is a necessary condition for...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: incompatibilism-arguments
    View source passageHide passage
    As an argument for incompatibilism, the appeal to the metaphor of the branching roads (“the garden of forking paths”) fails. If we strip away the metaphors, the main premise of the argument turns into the claim that we have genuine choices between alternative course of action only if our choosing and doing otherwise is compossible with the actual past and the actual laws. But this claim is none other than a statement of what the incompatibilist believes and the compatibilist denies.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective