An inductiveargument for [P1] based on intuitions about particular cases of justified belief will not support [P1], since many of our intuitively most justified beliefs run afoul of [P1]
To violate or contradict something; to go against a rule or principle.
inductive argument(contrasted with deductively valid arguments)
An argument that is not valid — it is possible for all its premises to be true while its conclusion is false — but which can still transmit justification on non-deductivist views.
justified belief(Coherence theory of justification)
A belief that is part of a coherent system of beliefs
It has also been argued that [P1] is unjustified (Pust 2001). There appear to be only two ways that [P1] could be justified. It might be justified by being intuitive or by being supported by our intuitions regarding particular cases of justified belief. [P1] is not, however, intuitive. Furthermore, an inductive argument for [P1] based on our intuitions about particular cases of justified belief will not support [P1] since many of what seem, intuitively, to be our most justified beliefs run afoul