Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that An infinitesimal hyperreal exists

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Mathematical existence requires either explicit construction or derivation from axioms accepted as ontologically committed, not merely consistency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The hyperreals exist only relative to a non-constructive ultrafilter whose existence depends on the Axiom of Choice, making their ontological status model-relative rather than absolute.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A quantity that cannot be specified, measured, or distinguished within any physical or computational procedure lacks the determinate existence required for mathematical realism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Berkeley's critique in 'The Analyst' established that infinitesimals generate logical contradictions when treated as both zero and nonzero within the same deductive system.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Robinson's hyperreals evade Berkeley's contradiction only by relocating infinitesimals to a non-standard model, meaning standard mathematics remains committed to no infinitesimal quantities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Existence claims about entities visible only from outside the standard model are epistemically inaccessible and thus philosophically idle for grounding mathematical practice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.An infinite hyperreal a exists such that a > n for every natural number n
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The reciprocal 1/a of an infinite hyperreal a exceeds 0 and is smaller than 1/(n+1) for every natural number n
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.