Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that An institution whose agents share the very defect it is designed to remedy cannot reliably serve as the external corrective that makes harmony possible.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Shared defects can create mutual accountability; agents with identical weaknesses may better recognize and check each other's lapses.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Perfect external correctives are unavailable, so requiring them is unrealistic; imperfect institutions may still improve outcomes substantially.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Self-awareness of shared defects can motivate institutional design that compensates through checks, transparency, and distributed power.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Agents who possess a defect lack the perceptual clarity needed to identify and correct that same defect in others reliably.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
External correctives derive their legitimacy and effectiveness from moral or epistemic authority that defect-carriers cannot possess.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Systems cannot bootstrap themselves out of systemic problems; they require external standards independent of the problem itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.