Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    An intention whose satisfaction necessarily depends on an... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Bratman's account of shared intention is defective because intentions of the form 'I intend that we X' violate the condition that one can only intend one's own action.

    An intention whose satisfaction necessarily depends on another's unconstrained agency is structurally distinct from genuine intention and is better classified as a wish or hope.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Intentions constitute commitments to bring about states of affairs; dependence on others' unconstrained choices undermines this constitutive feature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.We distinguish intentions from wishes by their actionability—we can directly execute intentions but not wishes. Dependence on others removes this criterion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Practical reasoning about intentions requires confidence in causal efficacy of one's own will; dependence on others' agency breaks this rational structure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Many genuine intentions involve dependent components: intending to teach presupposes students' receptiveness; intending to negotiate presupposes another's participation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The distinction rests on an artificial boundary; partial dependence on others' agency exists on a continuum, not a sharp categorical divide.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Collective intentions (we intend to build a bridge together) are structurally dependent on others' unconstrained agency yet remain genuine intentions, not wishes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Bratman's account of shared intention is defective because intentions of the for...Collective intentions (we intend to build a bridge together) are structurally de...Intentions constitute commitments to bring about states of affairs; dependence o...Many genuine intentions involve dependent components: intending to teach presupp...
    +3 moreShow less
    Practical reasoning about intentions requires confidence in causal efficacy of o...The distinction rests on an artificial boundary; partial dependence on others' a...We distinguish intentions from wishes by their actionability—we can directly exe...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit