Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that An internalB relation is fully determined by the intrinsic natures of its relata, meaning it adds no additional unifying structure beyond those natures.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Spatial distance between objects cannot be derived from intrinsic natures alone; it requires external structural facts about positions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Identity conditions for relations often appeal to structural features (like symmetry or transitivity) not contained in individual relata.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Mathematical relations like 'greater than' seem to impose genuine constraints that transcend the numbers themselves as independent entities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If relations added structure beyond relata natures, they would be entities requiring further explanation, creating infinite regress.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Intrinsic properties fully determine all counterfactual facts about an object; relational facts should similarly reduce to intrinsic facts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
We observe no empirical evidence of relations as primitive unifiers separate from the properties of related things themselves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42