Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    An internalB relation is fully determined by the intrinsi... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→InternalB relations cannot serve as the relating relation between A and B, because they generate an infinite process of division rather than genuine relatedness.

    An internalB relation is fully determined by the intrinsic natures of its relata, meaning it adds no additional unifying structure beyond those natures.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If relations added structure beyond relata natures, they would be entities requiring further explanation, creating infinite regress.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Intrinsic properties fully determine all counterfactual facts about an object; relational facts should similarly reduce to intrinsic facts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.We observe no empirical evidence of relations as primitive unifiers separate from the properties of related things themselves.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Spatial distance between objects cannot be derived from intrinsic natures alone; it requires external structural facts about positions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Identity conditions for relations often appeal to structural features (like symmetry or transitivity) not contained in individual relata.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Mathematical relations like 'greater than' seem to impose genuine constraints that transcend the numbers themselves as independent entities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Identity conditions for relations often appeal to structural features (like symm...If relations added structure beyond relata natures, they would be entities requi...InternalB relations cannot serve as the relating relation between A and B, becau...Intrinsic properties fully determine all counterfactual facts about an object; r...
    +3 moreShow less
    Mathematical relations like 'greater than' seem to impose genuine constraints th...Spatial distance between objects cannot be derived from intrinsic natures alone;...We observe no empirical evidence of relations as primitive unifiers separate fro...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit