Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that An omnipotent agent ought not to be required to have the power to bring about state of affairs (f).

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Conjunct (2) is not a state of affairs to be 'brought about' but rather an absence of causation, which is a relational property of the total causal history.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.An omnipotent agent who timelessly creates the entire causal order can determine, by creative decree, which events lack antecedent sufficient conditions within that order.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If God timelessly ordains the complete causal structure of history, the absence of a prior sufficient cause for Plato's decision is itself within God's creative power, not beyond it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Frankfurt-style cases show that an agent can act freely even when a counterfactual intervener would have ensured the same outcome, undermining the tight link between causal absence and freedom.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If libertarian free will does not require the absence of all sufficient causal conditions but only the absence of compulsive or determining external causes, conjunct (2) is either false or redundant.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A state of affairs wrongly analyzed as requiring causal absence does not impose a genuine logical limit on omnipotence; it merely reflects a contested and potentially mistaken theory of freedom.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.State of affairs (f) is identifiable with or analyzable as a conjunctive state of affairs with three conjuncts: (1) Plato decides to write a dialogue, (2) there is no antecedent sufficient causal condition of Plato's deciding to write a dialogue, and (3) there is no concurrent sufficient causal condition of Plato's deciding to write a dialogue.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.It is impossible for an agent to have power over what is past.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Because it is impossible for an agent to have power over what is past, the second conjunct of this state of affairs is not possibly brought about by anyone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.