Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    An unpaid debt is unjust — Carmelics
    Home/Proof of definition segments
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→It is not that the debt can be paid

    An unpaid debt is unjust

    Proof of definition segments
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Proof of definition segmentsEternal Conscious Torment

    Related

    It is not that the debt can be paid

    Similar

    It is not that the debt can be paid80%God is not unjust

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Proof of definition segments
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    79%
    If it is not that the debt is finite, then it is not that the debt can...75%
    If the above is true, then the debt can be paid74%

    Source

    Mindmap

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Notes

    <html> <head> </head> <body> <p> This reply seemed almost impossible to work into anything deeper in the subsequent argumentation (so as to create a definitive and exact rebuttal of a specific point (rebutting ~A when given A), which is why I put it under "It is not that the debt can be paid" (and which may mean that my theory that all argumentation <i>should</i>&#xa0;be able to rebut a specific point is incorrect). However, it might be that the supporting argumentation is not thorough enough to pinpoint the exact spot of dissention.. The desire is still there: whenever possible, it is to be preferred for organization's and clarity's sake. </p> </body> </html>

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective