Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Analogical arguments cannot provide Bayesian confirmation... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Analogical arguments cannot provide Bayesian confirmation of a hypothesis

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Bayesian confirmation requires that evidence proposition E raises the conditional probability of hypothesis H relative to background knowledge K
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The information contained in an analogical argument typically cannot be encapsulated in a single evidence proposition E
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Even if such a proposition E can be formulated, the information it contains is already part of background knowledge K, making E·K equivalent to K and leaving Pr(H|E·K) equal to Pr(H|K)
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Truth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Analogical arguments are often applied to novel hypotheses H for which the prior...Bayesian confirmation requires that evidence proposition E raises the conditiona...Even if such a proposition E can be formulated, the information it contains is a...The information contained in an analogical argument typically cannot be encapsul...

    Similar

    Some arguments are incapable of transmitting justification depending o...81%James's Will to Believe argument holds that any hypothesis forming par...80%Therefore E8 cannot be evidence for Q8*80%An argument fails to provide convincing evidence for its conclusion if...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: reasoning-analogy
    View source passageHide passage
    ” A modal extension of this principle runs roughly as follows: if problems might be essentially the same, then they might have essentially the same solution. There are two modalities here. , that the source and target domains ‘might be essentially the same’ in relevant respects. ’ To call a hypothesis prima facie plausible is to elevate it to the point where it merits investigation, since it might be correct. The argument is vulnerable to two sorts of concerns. First, there are questions about
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit