Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Animal-level or severely impaired human-level consciousne... — Carmelics
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The divine aspect of both Forrest's and Pfeifer's pantheisms is implausible, because the consciousness attributable to the universe falls far short of what is required for divinity.

    Animal-level or severely impaired human-level consciousness does not meet the standard of consciousness required to count as God.

    Against an aspect of GodConsciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & MindAgainst an aspect of God

    Connections

    1 topic

    Natural Theology1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consciousness & Mind
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The divine aspect of both Forrest's and Pfeifer's pantheisms is implausible, bec...The intentionality the universe would possess—either intrinsically (Pfeifer) or ...

    Similar

    Attention is not sufficient for consciousness81%Therefore, consciousness cannot become an objective content of conscio...78%Apperception (saṃjñā) and consciousness (vijñāna) are not clearly diss...78%A fully adequate account of consciousness cannot be captured in words76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: god-ultimates
    View source passageHide passage
    On the other end of the spectrum from these varieties of theistic dualism, we find pantheism, the species of monism that takes the One to be God (a general model, 13). All monisms face a problem of unity: how are the many things in the world integrated enough to call them One? But pantheisms face an additional problem of divinity: even if all is truly One, does the One have what it takes to be God? Here we will focus on two contemporary pantheisms, both in Buckareff & Nagasawa (2016): what w

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective